ROVIN' AND RAVIN' WITH MIKE
Copyright © 2001 by Michael Segers, All rights reserved
|
|
The Pledge; Thirteen Days
|
|
The
Pledge Beginning way back in 1931
with Fritz Lang's M,
the child-murderer has provided an ultimate problem for filmmakers, who look at
that most repulsive of criminals for some image of ourselves. Sean Penn's new
effort, I'm surprised but delighted to report, can share a megaplex with the
great German film any time. Of course, since it is based on a novel by the Swiss
Friedrich Dürrenmatt, it has a Germanic connection. The connection between two
of Madonna's husbands—her ex, Penn, and her current, Ritchie—both having
films released in the same week, I'll leave for someone else to analyze
(especially since Ritchie's film has a title which may or may not be appropriate
for our family-friendly freenet, but since he is Mr. Madonna, it probably
isn't.) While the earlier film
focused on the murderer (spookily played by Peter Lorre), the current film not
only keeps Detective Jerry Black, the policeman-protagonist (Jack Nicholson) under
scrutiny, it tears deeply into his mind and soul as he faces and deals with the
murder of a little girl. Black does not believe that the chief suspect (Benicio
Del
Toro), who confesses to the crime, is the murderer. As Black delays his
retirement to investigate this last case (Seven, anyone?), he makes an
almost allegorical quest among bruised and broken folks played by some very
impressive actors (Helen Mirren, Vanessa Redgrave, Mickey Rourke, and Dean Stanton). Then, with the
appearance of a waitress and young mother (Robin Wright Penn), we seem to be able
to breathe fresh air again, well, to take one breath, before Nicholson and
director Penn, drag us further along their obsessive way. This is a film that I want
to rave and rave about, but, frankly, I'm having to slap myself on the wrists
even as I type this (quite a challenge) to make sure that I have not given away
one detail too many. One detail that I can give away is that this is Nicholson's
film from beginning to end, and it records possibly the greatest performance he
has ever given, as he tears out territory on the edge of sanity and salvation,
despair and damnation, that not even he has ever explored. This is not a film
for everyone, please be assured, but it is a film that will, I hope, be with us
for a long time. And, speaking of a long time, this is one film that justifies
itself every minute of its runtime, unlike... |
Thirteen
Days It's hard to create much
suspense when we already know what happened. And, I assume, most of the audience
knows that the United States and the Soviet Union did not go to war in October
1962; the Eastern Seaboard is not in ruins. So, that's the first problem with Thirteen
Days. Oh, and it is also hard to sustain suspense across two and a
half-hours, but, hey, this is a Kevin (Waterworld) Costner project. While we in the audience
feel no suspense, the film does create the moods and tensions of the country and
the White House during the two-week standoff between the United States and the
Soviet Union. Mainly, the tension boils down to the question of how the United
States would or could respond to the presence of Soviet missiles in Cuba. Too
mild a response, and the Soviets could make the first strike; too strong, and
they might invade Berlin. That sort of either/or
issue wears thin long before the film lets it go. Perhaps the most intriguing
part of the film is in the behind-the-scenes dealing and wheeling with the
Soviet Union, so that all the people involved could save face... and, while they
were at it, save Western civilization as we know it. Costner plays—so the film
focuses on—O'Donnell, a relatively minor Kennedy friend and advisor. Making
that character the center of attention sometimes puts the events a little out of
kilter. Who gets the blame for the excruciating length of this project—Costner
as producer or Donaldson as director—I don't know, but there is plenty of
blame and time for blame for both. There is too much padding, with file footage
and awkward bits with O'Donnell's family. I ultimately judge a film
on a rather elusive quality that I call "movieness." I may not be
able to tell you what that is, but I surely know what it isn't, and there isn't
anything very movie-ish about this movie. I had trouble keeping up with all the
white boys in dark suits and bad haircuts, finally trying to tell them apart by
remembering which one drank coffee and which whiskey. The flat, trying-to-be
taut style feels more like a documentary—right down to the characters’ names
being shown on the screen when they first appear—or even an Oliver Stone
reject than a very big budget film.
|
Keep your feet dry, and your heart full of
noble thoughts, and give yourself an award for keeping up with what's going on
at the movies. To be honest, as I look back on this past year, it seems that the
producers and directors, actors and scriptwriters, haven’t been giving us a
lot of rewards.