ROVIN’ AND RAVIN’ WITH MIKE

Copyright © 2000 by Michael Segers, All rights reserved  

The American Way of Drugs

 

Jury duty is supposed to be a great equalizer, a chance to get a true cross section of Americans. If that is so, then a true cross section of Americans, it seemed to me as I looked around the auditorium, must have cell phones grafted to their ears. One young woman sitting in front of me was taking out her frustration on her cell phone, jabbing the numbers. "I could be at the office making lots of money," she complained into her phone, "but I've got to be here."

Both times that I was called out to a courtroom, she was in my group, dragging a designer duffel bag and complaining. The second time we were called out, we were escorted to a courtroom where a jury would be selected to hear a charge of marijuana possession.

The judge explained that we would all be asked if we had any experiences that would affect our ability to judge the case fairly. I looked around the group, and it seemed that the powers that be certainly had thrown together a diverse group of Americans for this jury: some white, some black, some old, some young, some dressed stylishly, others looking as if they were unaware of their clothes.

The woman with the telephone seemed to be the youngest in our group, a slickly tailored, stylish young career woman marching at the head of the group whenever we were called anywhere. It seemed that the oldest member of the group was a man who slouched along at the rear of the group, dragging his feet in outsized tennis shoes, standing and sitting heavily. One of the first to answer the question, he began to cry. In the past year, he told us, he had buried his son, who was not yet thirty, who had died of a drug overdose.

His story seemed so familiar. In the past year, I've driven a good friend to the airport. For years, I had watched helplessly as he had watched helplessly as his son sank deeper into a drug-induced hell. Now, he was leaving to plan the funeral of his son, who was not yet thirty. In some ways, those two young men—my friend's son and the son of my fellow potential juror—were lucky, at least, in comparison to their fathers.

One of the women spoke bitterly of her grandson's involvement with drugs, and insisted that she would throw the book at, she would nip in the bud, she would punish severely anyone with drugs. Another woman told of her sister's murder in a drug deal. Another spoke of how her ex-husband's drug abuse had destroyed their marriage.

Finally, all but one of us had spoken. Only one of us had said that no one in the family, no parent or spouse, no child or sibling, no cousin or niece or nephew, had ever been touched by drug abuse. Then, the young woman with the cell phone spoke in a flat voice, with none of the tenseness and anger that I had heard earlier, about her sister's drug abuse, arrests, and rehabilitation, her sister’s loss of husband and children. "When I look at him," she nodded toward the defendant, "I see my sister."

A little cynicism kicked in, and I wondered whether that night, she would laugh with her sister about how she had avoided jury duty with a whopper. I hope that in the presence of so much pain, we all were telling the truth.

She was spared jury duty. I wasn't.

Three days later, I returned for the trial. There were five court employees--the judge, two bailiffs, and two clerks. There were four lawyers, two on either side. The deputy who had arrested the young man had to be available until the trial was over. All of this for a bit of marijuana that could have been mailed—if one were so reckless—for a single postage stamp.

We were not told what the possible sentence would be. We were not told what the young man's record was. We were told the facts, as remembered by the deputy, the defendant, and the defendant's girl friend. And so we reached our decision, a decision read by our foreman, whose brother and nephew had both given his name when they had been arrested for drug possession. "Not guilty."

Now, I come to the point of this article. The young man hugged his girl friend. The two defense lawyers shook hands. The two state attorneys, the prosecutors, mumbled to themselves. We jurors filed out the back of the courtroom, got our parking permits validated, and left.

That is the point, the only point. A cross-section of Americans, faded back into society, taking with them the memories of this experience, memories of the pain that their loved ones have experienced… and caused. There is no point.

Through a half dozen different versions of this article, I've tried to drag it to a point. I've looked at three books and a dozen web sites. But, there is no point, just a great deal of suffering. There is no point, no solution either.

As usual, I want to point you in the direction of good information. Unfortunately, the best reference on this subject that I know of, The Recovery Resource Book, by Barbara Yoder (1990) has over three hundred pages crammed with pre-Web materials. It is an impressive, even overwhelming reference book that I hope someone will update.

The Internet provides us with a wealth of information, of course. The best starting point is the web site of Alcoholics Anonymous, the first of the self-help recovery groupsThe practical spirituality of Alcoholics Anonymous, which breaks complicated things into simple lists and sometimes simplistic answers, turns off people who are not comfortable with the organization’s religious emphasis. An alternative is LifeRing Secular Sobriety.   One of the best known recovery centers, Hazelden Foundation is also the leading publisher of recovery books. Their web site, by the way, maintains their high reputation and standards.

Once again, I find that the conscientious guides of About.com have done a lot of the hard web-surfing for me with the Alcoholism/Substance Abuse site,  although that division is misleading. Instead of speaking of "drugs and alcohol," I believe that we should speak of "alcohol and other drugs." Whenever I speak about drugs—even when I spoke to my high school classes—I am always honest about taking comfort from this legal substance, one of our oldest friends and oldest scourges as well.

That leads me down the path of over-intellectualizing and splitting hairs and meanings just to take myself (and you, gentle reader) further from meaning. I’ve spent more time on this article than on any other in this series, and I’m not happy with it.

And so, your unhappy old columnist leaves you to rove and rave alone. Keep your feet dry (take care of yourself), and your heart—full of noble thoughts, of course—open to the folks in the jury pool and at the defendant’s table, even the folks at the dinner table with you, who may be suffering in ways that you cannot imagine.

Rovin' Through Medical Alternatives

Rovin' and Ravin' Home

 

Google
Search WWW Search www.peanut.org